No Offense, But Apology Isn`t Necessary
By Doug Marlette, Hillsborough, NC
Last week, I drew a cartoon showing a man in Middle Eastern garb driving a Ryder truck hauling a nuke with the caption, "What Would Mohammed Drive?" The drawing was a takeoff on the recent controversy among Christian evangelicals over the morality of driving gas-guzzling SUVs, "What would Jesus drive?"
To a cartoonist working in the current geo-political atmosphere it is a natural step to ask, "What would Mohammed drive?" And I`m sorry to report that the image in post-Sept. 11 America that leaps to mind is the Ryder truck given to us by the terrorist Timothy McVeigh, carrying a nuclear warhead and driven, alas, not by an Irish-Catholic, an ultra-orthodox Jew or a Southern Baptist, but, yes, by an Islamic militant.
Unfortunately, for many Americans these days, such a leap of the imagination is not a great stretch. Hence, the homeland security office. We have watched Islamic militants commit suicide by flying planes into our buildings, killing thousands of innocent civilians, including many Arab Americans.
In Afghanistan, we watched the Taliban murder noncompliant women and destroy great works of art. We watched an American reporter decapitated by Muslim "true believers." We watched young Palestinian suicide bombers murder innocents in cafes and markets and on buses, in the name of the Prophet Muhammad.
Such nihilists are considered by many Muslims to be martyrs worthy of admiration and emulation. Meanwhile, an Arab country led by a genocidal maniac intent upon developing weapons of mass destruction is bringing us into war.
How would you have drawn it?
My cartoon has prompted a firestorm of reaction orchestrated by a lobbying group called CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). This is not the first time my cartoons have prompted such organized attacks.
Years ago when I went after the corrupt excesses of Tammy Faye and Jim Bakker`s Praise The Lord Club, for example, I similarly outraged fundamentalist Christians with cartoons that, like this one, depicted the obvious correlations of real events to instinctive imagery.
That, by the way, defines the art of political cartooning. The objective is not to soothe and tend sensitive psyches, but to jab and poke in an attempt to get at deeper truths, popular or otherwise. The truth, like it or not, is that Muslim fundamentalists have committed devastating acts of terrorism against our country in the name of their prophet.
My only regret is that the thousands who e-mailed me complaining felt that my drawing was an assault upon their religion or its founder. It was not. It was an assault on the distortion of their religion by murderous fanatics and zealots.
In fact, I have received death threats and hate mail throughout the years for standing up for the rights of minorities in my drawings, including Muslims and Arab Americans. Just as Christianity and Judaism and probably Zoroastrianism are distorted by murderous fanatics and zealots, so, too, is the religion of Islam.
May I rest assured that the constituents of CAIR who e-mailed their outrage to me and my newspaper were just as vigorous in condemning those who dishonored their religion with the attack on the World Trade Center? Have they been equally diligent at protesting the widespread support-among intellectuals, "charities" and government officials-that the terrorists enjoy in the Muslim states of the Middle East? Were they part of the anti-Taliban movement in this country that long predated Sept. 11?
In my 30-year career I have regularly drawn cartoons that offend religious fundamentalists and true believers of every stripe, a fact that I tend to list in the "accomplishments" column of my resume. I have outraged fundamentalist Christians by skewering Jerry Falwell, Roman Catholics by needling the pope and Jews by criticizing Israel.
What I have learned from this experience is that those who rise up against the expression of ideas are strikingly similar.
No one is less tolerant than those demanding tolerance. A certain humorlessness, self-righteousness and literal-mindedness binds them. Despite differences of culture and creed, they all seem to share the egocentric notion that there is only one way of looking at things-their way-and that others have no right to see things differently. What I have learned from years of experience with this is one of the great lessons of all the world`s religions: We are all one in our humanness.
Here is my answer to them: In this country, we do not apologize for our opinions. Free speech is the linchpin of our republic. All other freedoms flow from it. I do not apologize for my drawing. Granted, there is nothing "fair" about cartoons. You cannot say "on the other hand" in them. They are harder to defend with logic. But this is why we have a First Amendment-so that we don`t feel the necessity to apologize for our ideas.
I welcome the thoughts of all those who made the effort to e-mail me. But what I would urge them to consider is that minorities should be especially vigilant about free speech and circumspect about urging apologies for opinions. Because history shows that when free speech goes, it is always the minorities who are the most vulnerable and suffer the most from its absence.
Just ask the Arabs currently being held in detention without being charged with a crime. That`s how it works in totalitarian regimes. This is not a totalitarian country, which, I presume, is one of the reasons those who wrote to me live here.
